5 Reasons Your Behavior-Based Safety System Isn't Working– and How to Fix It
- Bill Sims Company, Inc.
- Aug 13
- 6 min read
Walk onto almost any construction site, into any manufacturing plant, or through any utility yard, and you'll likely find some version of a Behavior-Based Safety (BBS) program in place. Observation cards, near-miss logs, a laminated list of "critical behaviors" taped to a break room wall— the infrastructure of BBS is everywhere.
What's far less common is a program that actually changes how people work. The gap between having a BBS program and having one that moves the needle on critical behaviors is where the real story lives.
Like most safety processes, there's been a lot of debate over the years about the efficacy of BBS programs. It's one of the more durable ideas in industrial safety, and for good reason. But it's also one of the easiest programs to implement badly while still looking, on paper, like it's running smoothly.
Whether you're already running a BBS program or not, understanding why BBS fails and what the organizations that get it right do differently helps us understand how to increase positive, safe behaviors on the job.
What Exactly is Behavior-Based Safety?
At its core, BBS is a simple proposition: most incidents are preceded by specific, identifiable behaviors, and if you can observe and influence those behaviors before something goes wrong, you can prevent the injury altogether.
BBS embodied a meaningful shift from traditional reactive safety management. Instead of waiting for an incident, investigating what happened, and then writing a corrective action, BBS asks organizations to pay attention to how work is done:
What behaviors are happening consistently?
Which behaviors create risk?
Which safe behaviors should be reinforced?
What can supervisors and employees do differently in the moment?
Most BBS programs therefore involve some combination of identifying critical behaviors, conducting observations, providing feedback, collecting data, and involving employees in the process.
The problem isn't usually the framework. It's what happens when the framework meets the realities of your workplace.
#1 Your BBS Program Has Become a Box-Checking Exercise.
The warning sign:
You know exactly how many observations were completed last month, but can't tell what actually changed because of them.
This is one of the easiest ways for BBS to go off track. If observation counts become the target, people naturally start optimizing for the number to complete their quotas. Soon, the observation itself becomes the objective. Companies can have a strong BBS dashboard and a program that's not influencing behavior at all— which makes subsequent incidents all the more frustrating.
Ask yourself: Can we point to specific behaviors or processes that have improved because of our BBS observations? If the answer is no, your program may be measuring activity without creating meaningful behavior change.
How to fix it: Don't treat observation volume as the primary measure of success.
Observation data should be used to answer questions like:
Which behaviors are improving?
Where are at-risk behaviors recurring?
Which locations, tasks, or shifts need additional attention?
Are employees receiving feedback?
Are supervisors following up?
What changes have we made as a result of what we're seeing?
#2 Feedback is Too Little, Too Late.
The warning sign:
Employees are observed on Monday, the observation gets entered into a system, the data is reviewed at a meeting the following week—and nobody ever talks to the employee who was actually observed.
The most valuable part of an observation isn't the observation itself; it's what happens immediately afterward. Effective BBS depends on the connection between behavior and consequence.
Direct feedback is the consequence we can use to reinforce positive, safe behavior. Without it, you're just collecting data without actually changing anything about your performance or culture.
The closer feedback is to the behavior itself, the more relevant and meaningful that feedback can be.
Ask yourself: When was the last time an employee was recognized for a specific safe behavior in the same moment it happened? If you can't remember, your BBS process may have a feedback problem.
How to fix it: The power of behavior-based safety is in the quality of the conversation that happens immediately after an observation.
A supervisor who says, "Nice job keeping three points of contact there" has reinforced a specific behavior.
A supervisor who says, "You need to be more careful around ladders," has provided a vague instruction.
And a supervisor who never says anything has provided no behavioral feedback at all.
Build the conversation into the observation— not as a separate step that may or may not happen later. That means training observers and supervisors to do three things:
Recognize: name the specific behavior ("You used three points of contact on that ladder.")
Coach: explain why it matters ("That's what keeps you stable if your foot slips.")
Reinforce: encourage the employee to repeat it ("Thank you, keep it up!")
And don't reserve those conversations for problems. A BBS program should create frequent opportunities to tell people what they're doing right, not just what they're doing wrong.
3. Your BBS Program Is More Surveillance Than Support
The warning sign:
Employees visibly tense up when an observer approaches. People change their behavior the second they spot a supervisor, and observation cards become something to avoid.
This is a subtle failure, but it's a serious one that's often a sticking point with BBS. If employees experience BBS primarily as a way to catch them doing something wrong, the program starts to feel like an inspection rather than a safety improvement process.
If people feel watched instead of supported, honest participation becomes much harder to sustain.
Ask yourself: What happens more often in our BBS program: catching an at-risk behavior or recognizing a safe one?
If the answer is overwhelmingly the former, supervisors and employees may forget what the program is really for.
How to fix it: Make positive reinforcement a visible, intentional part of the observation process. At-risk behaviors still need to be addressed, especially when there is immediate danger.
But employees should also regularly hear:
What they did right
Why it matters
Sincere commendation for their safe behavior
Recognition like this isn't a throwaway compliment. It tells employees which behaviors the organization wants repeated. And when recognition is specific, immediate, and credible, it becomes part of the behavioral feedback loop that drives stronger performance and a positive workplace culture.
4. Supervisors Aren't Really Part of the Program
The warning sign:
Safety owns BBS, and employees are expected to participate— but supervisors are too busy to conduct observations, have coaching conversations, or follow up on what the data is showing.
This is one of the easiest disconnects a BBS program can have. Employees read organizational priorities through what they see their leaders doing, not what the safety manual says.
If a supervisor skips observations, rushes through feedback, or treats BBS as "the safety department's job," employees will notice and participation starts to feel optional.
Ask yourself: Would our supervisors describe BBS as part of their job or as something the safety department wants them to do?
How to fix it: Engage supervisors as active participants in the success of your BBS process by equipping them with the tools they need to succeed, not just a checklist. They need to know how to:
Identify specific behaviors
Give effective feedback
Recognize safe performance
Coach without creating defensiveness
Respond appropriately to at-risk behaviors
Use observation trends to improve the work
Most importantly, give supervisors enough time and organizational support to actually do it. You can't make frontline coaching a priority while treating it like an extra task supervisors are expected to squeeze in.
5. You're Asking BBS to Fix Problems That Aren't Behavioral
The warning sign:
Your organization keeps seeing the same incidents even though employees have been repeatedly coached on it.
That's a good reason to stop and ask a different question: Is this actually a behavior problem? BBS is designed to influence behavior. It can't compensate for a poorly designed process, unrealistic production schedules, inadequate training, staffing issues, or poor hazard controls. Sometimes, the behavior you're observing is a symptom of a systemic problem.
Ask yourself: Are we repeatedly coaching the same behavior without changing the conditions that make that behavior sticky? If your answer is yes, you may be treating a system problem as an employee problem.
How to fix it: Use BBS observations as a signal, not just a score. If the same unwanted behavior or incident keeps appearing, investigate why:
Is the procedure practical?
Is the equipment adequate?
Are employees properly trained?
Are production pressures influencing the behavior?
Is the safest method also the easiest method?
Is there an engineering or administrative control that should address the hazard instead?
BBS is most effective when it operates within a broader safety system, and it can even expose areas for improvement, but it can't compensate for weaknesses in that system.
The Missing Link: Close the Loop
If there's one idea worth taking away from all of this, it's that the observation itself is the least important part of the BBS process.
An observation just collects data. What actually changes behavior is what you do with that data. Honest conversations, recognition, coaching, and follow-through are the backbone of an effective BBS program.
The strongest BBS programs get these 4 things right:
Feedback happens close to the moment it's earned.
Safe behavior gets more airtime than at-risk behavior.
Supervisors treat coaching as a core element of their job, not an add-on.
The whole effort sits inside a broader safety strategy rather than standing in for one.
Through consistent feedback, credible leadership involvement, and a genuine focus on changing behavior rather than documenting it, you can support a strong safety system that actually changes how people work.
SmartCard® helps organizations close that loop by giving supervisors a simple way to recognize safe behaviors in the moment, and giving employees a reason to keep repeating them.
Comments